100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery

James Jun Zhou, Michael T. Koltz, Nitin Agarwal, Zachary J. Tempel, Adam S. Kanter, David O. Okonkwo, D. Kojo Hamilton

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Abstract

Study Design. Bibliometric analysis. Objective. To apply the established technique of citation analysis to identify the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research published between 1900 and 2015. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have applied the technique of citation analysis to other areas of study. This is the first article to apply this technique to the field of scoliosis surgery. Methods. A two-step search of the Thomson Reuters Web of Science was conducted to identify all articles relevant to the field of scoliosis surgery. The top 100 articles with the most citations were identified based on analysis of titles and abstracts. Further statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether measures of author reputation and overall publication influence affected the rate at which publications were recognized and incorporated by other researchers in the field. Results. Total citations for the final 100 publications included in the list ranged from 82 to 509. The period for publication ranged from 1954 to 2010. Most studies were published in the journal Spine (n=63). The most frequently published topics of study were surgical techniques (n=35) and outcomes (n=35). Measures of author reputation (number of total studies in the top 100, number of first-Author studies in the top 100) were found to have no effect on the rate at which studies were adopted by other researchers (number of years until first citation, and number of years until maximum citations). The number of citations/year a publication received was found to be negatively correlated with the rate at which it was adopted by other researchers, indicating that more influential manuscripts attained more rapid recognition by the scientific community at large. Conclusion. In assembling this publication, we have strived to identify and recognize the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research from 1900 to 2015. Level of Evidence: N/A.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages336-344
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Publications
Research Personnel
Research
Bibliometrics
Manuscripts
Spine

Keywords

  • bibliometric study
  • citation analysis
  • scoliosis
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Zhou, J. J., Koltz, M. T., Agarwal, N., Tempel, Z. J., Kanter, A. S., Okonkwo, D. O., & Hamilton, D. K. (2017). 100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery. Spine, 42(5), 336-344. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860

100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery. / Zhou, James Jun; Koltz, Michael T.; Agarwal, Nitin; Tempel, Zachary J.; Kanter, Adam S.; Okonkwo, David O.; Hamilton, D. Kojo.

In: Spine, Vol. 42, No. 5, 01.03.2017, p. 336-344.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Zhou, JJ, Koltz, MT, Agarwal, N, Tempel, ZJ, Kanter, AS, Okonkwo, DO & Hamilton, DK 2017, '100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery' Spine, vol 42, no. 5, pp. 336-344. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860
Zhou JJ, Koltz MT, Agarwal N, Tempel ZJ, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO et al. 100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery. Spine. 2017 Mar 1;42(5):336-344. Available from, DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860
Zhou, James Jun ; Koltz, Michael T. ; Agarwal, Nitin ; Tempel, Zachary J. ; Kanter, Adam S. ; Okonkwo, David O. ; Hamilton, D. Kojo. / 100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery. In: Spine. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 336-344
@article{3759013d271146699acd45e54e98ba49,
title = "100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery",
abstract = "Study Design. Bibliometric analysis. Objective. To apply the established technique of citation analysis to identify the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research published between 1900 and 2015. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have applied the technique of citation analysis to other areas of study. This is the first article to apply this technique to the field of scoliosis surgery. Methods. A two-step search of the Thomson Reuters Web of Science was conducted to identify all articles relevant to the field of scoliosis surgery. The top 100 articles with the most citations were identified based on analysis of titles and abstracts. Further statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether measures of author reputation and overall publication influence affected the rate at which publications were recognized and incorporated by other researchers in the field. Results. Total citations for the final 100 publications included in the list ranged from 82 to 509. The period for publication ranged from 1954 to 2010. Most studies were published in the journal Spine (n=63). The most frequently published topics of study were surgical techniques (n=35) and outcomes (n=35). Measures of author reputation (number of total studies in the top 100, number of first-Author studies in the top 100) were found to have no effect on the rate at which studies were adopted by other researchers (number of years until first citation, and number of years until maximum citations). The number of citations/year a publication received was found to be negatively correlated with the rate at which it was adopted by other researchers, indicating that more influential manuscripts attained more rapid recognition by the scientific community at large. Conclusion. In assembling this publication, we have strived to identify and recognize the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research from 1900 to 2015. Level of Evidence: N/A.",
keywords = "bibliometric study, citation analysis, scoliosis, surgery",
author = "Zhou, {James Jun} and Koltz, {Michael T.} and Nitin Agarwal and Tempel, {Zachary J.} and Kanter, {Adam S.} and Okonkwo, {David O.} and Hamilton, {D. Kojo}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860",
volume = "42",
pages = "336--344",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 100 Most Influential Publications in Scoliosis Surgery

AU - Zhou,James Jun

AU - Koltz,Michael T.

AU - Agarwal,Nitin

AU - Tempel,Zachary J.

AU - Kanter,Adam S.

AU - Okonkwo,David O.

AU - Hamilton,D. Kojo

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Study Design. Bibliometric analysis. Objective. To apply the established technique of citation analysis to identify the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research published between 1900 and 2015. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have applied the technique of citation analysis to other areas of study. This is the first article to apply this technique to the field of scoliosis surgery. Methods. A two-step search of the Thomson Reuters Web of Science was conducted to identify all articles relevant to the field of scoliosis surgery. The top 100 articles with the most citations were identified based on analysis of titles and abstracts. Further statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether measures of author reputation and overall publication influence affected the rate at which publications were recognized and incorporated by other researchers in the field. Results. Total citations for the final 100 publications included in the list ranged from 82 to 509. The period for publication ranged from 1954 to 2010. Most studies were published in the journal Spine (n=63). The most frequently published topics of study were surgical techniques (n=35) and outcomes (n=35). Measures of author reputation (number of total studies in the top 100, number of first-Author studies in the top 100) were found to have no effect on the rate at which studies were adopted by other researchers (number of years until first citation, and number of years until maximum citations). The number of citations/year a publication received was found to be negatively correlated with the rate at which it was adopted by other researchers, indicating that more influential manuscripts attained more rapid recognition by the scientific community at large. Conclusion. In assembling this publication, we have strived to identify and recognize the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research from 1900 to 2015. Level of Evidence: N/A.

AB - Study Design. Bibliometric analysis. Objective. To apply the established technique of citation analysis to identify the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research published between 1900 and 2015. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have applied the technique of citation analysis to other areas of study. This is the first article to apply this technique to the field of scoliosis surgery. Methods. A two-step search of the Thomson Reuters Web of Science was conducted to identify all articles relevant to the field of scoliosis surgery. The top 100 articles with the most citations were identified based on analysis of titles and abstracts. Further statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether measures of author reputation and overall publication influence affected the rate at which publications were recognized and incorporated by other researchers in the field. Results. Total citations for the final 100 publications included in the list ranged from 82 to 509. The period for publication ranged from 1954 to 2010. Most studies were published in the journal Spine (n=63). The most frequently published topics of study were surgical techniques (n=35) and outcomes (n=35). Measures of author reputation (number of total studies in the top 100, number of first-Author studies in the top 100) were found to have no effect on the rate at which studies were adopted by other researchers (number of years until first citation, and number of years until maximum citations). The number of citations/year a publication received was found to be negatively correlated with the rate at which it was adopted by other researchers, indicating that more influential manuscripts attained more rapid recognition by the scientific community at large. Conclusion. In assembling this publication, we have strived to identify and recognize the 100 most influential articles in scoliosis surgery research from 1900 to 2015. Level of Evidence: N/A.

KW - bibliometric study

KW - citation analysis

KW - scoliosis

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013151335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013151335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001860

M3 - Review article

VL - 42

SP - 336

EP - 344

JO - Spine

T2 - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 5

ER -