Ablation of Advanced Subtypes of Atrial Fibrillation: Highlighting the Art of When and When Not to Perform Additional Ablation

Jorge Romero, Ricardo Avendano, Andrea Natale, Luigi Di Biase

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to determine the role of pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as to determine based on prospective randomized data which other approaches may increase the success rate of radiofrequency ablation of persistent AF. Recent Findings: Special attention must be paid to detect, diagnose, and optimize management of reversible or treatable causes of persistent AF such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and stress. Though the role of PVs is more pronounced in paroxysmal AF than in persistent AF, performing an adequate PV isolation is still a key part in treating persistent AF. There are now numerous techniques to obtain long-lasting pulmonary vein isolation and avoid esophageal damage. Patients with persistent AF will frequently require a more aggressive mapping and ablative approach. Ablation of sites associated with non-PV triggers such as the entire posterior wall, the roof, the anterior part of the left atrial (LA) septum, the left atrial appendage (LAA), the coronary sinus, and the superior vena cava has been shown to improve the freedom from AF at follow-up when combined with PV isolation. We do not encourage the use of empiric lines or complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Several studies have shown the role of empirical LAA electrical isolation in persistent AF. Summary: When focal ectopic atrial activity is observed after PV isolation, its activation sequence is compared to that of sinus rhythm, allowing quick identification of its origin. For significant non-PV triggers (repetitive isolated beats, focal atrial tachycardias or beats triggering AF/atrial flutter), a more detailed activation mapping is performed in the area of origin. They are subsequently targeted with focal ablation, except for triggers originating from the superior vena cava (SVC), LAA, or coronary sinus, for which complete isolation of these structures is the ablation strategy of choice. We truly believe the LAA and the posterior LA wall deserve special consideration when managing patients with persistent AF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number19
JournalCurrent Cardiovascular Risk Reports
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Art
Atrial Fibrillation
Pulmonary Veins
Atrial Appendage
Superior Vena Cava
Coronary Sinus
Veins
Atrial Septum
Cardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques
Atrial Flutter
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Hyperthyroidism
Hypothyroidism
Tachycardia
Communicable Diseases
Obesity
Hypertension

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF)
  • Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs)
  • Left atrial appendage (LAA)s
  • Pulmonary veins (PV)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Ablation of Advanced Subtypes of Atrial Fibrillation : Highlighting the Art of When and When Not to Perform Additional Ablation. / Romero, Jorge; Avendano, Ricardo; Natale, Andrea; Di Biase, Luigi.

In: Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, Vol. 11, No. 6, 19, 01.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Romero, Jorge; Avendano, Ricardo; Natale, Andrea; Di Biase, Luigi / Ablation of Advanced Subtypes of Atrial Fibrillation : Highlighting the Art of When and When Not to Perform Additional Ablation.

In: Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, Vol. 11, No. 6, 19, 01.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{efb85f222e1642b8af05fe70b5a70fde,
title = "Ablation of Advanced Subtypes of Atrial Fibrillation: Highlighting the Art of When and When Not to Perform Additional Ablation",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to determine the role of pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as to determine based on prospective randomized data which other approaches may increase the success rate of radiofrequency ablation of persistent AF. Recent Findings: Special attention must be paid to detect, diagnose, and optimize management of reversible or treatable causes of persistent AF such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and stress. Though the role of PVs is more pronounced in paroxysmal AF than in persistent AF, performing an adequate PV isolation is still a key part in treating persistent AF. There are now numerous techniques to obtain long-lasting pulmonary vein isolation and avoid esophageal damage. Patients with persistent AF will frequently require a more aggressive mapping and ablative approach. Ablation of sites associated with non-PV triggers such as the entire posterior wall, the roof, the anterior part of the left atrial (LA) septum, the left atrial appendage (LAA), the coronary sinus, and the superior vena cava has been shown to improve the freedom from AF at follow-up when combined with PV isolation. We do not encourage the use of empiric lines or complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Several studies have shown the role of empirical LAA electrical isolation in persistent AF. Summary: When focal ectopic atrial activity is observed after PV isolation, its activation sequence is compared to that of sinus rhythm, allowing quick identification of its origin. For significant non-PV triggers (repetitive isolated beats, focal atrial tachycardias or beats triggering AF/atrial flutter), a more detailed activation mapping is performed in the area of origin. They are subsequently targeted with focal ablation, except for triggers originating from the superior vena cava (SVC), LAA, or coronary sinus, for which complete isolation of these structures is the ablation strategy of choice. We truly believe the LAA and the posterior LA wall deserve special consideration when managing patients with persistent AF.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation (AF), Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs), Left atrial appendage (LAA)s, Pulmonary veins (PV)",
author = "Jorge Romero and Ricardo Avendano and Andrea Natale and {Di Biase}, Luigi",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s12170-017-0544-7",
volume = "11",
journal = "Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports",
issn = "1932-9520",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ablation of Advanced Subtypes of Atrial Fibrillation

T2 - Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

AU - Romero,Jorge

AU - Avendano,Ricardo

AU - Natale,Andrea

AU - Di Biase,Luigi

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to determine the role of pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as to determine based on prospective randomized data which other approaches may increase the success rate of radiofrequency ablation of persistent AF. Recent Findings: Special attention must be paid to detect, diagnose, and optimize management of reversible or treatable causes of persistent AF such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and stress. Though the role of PVs is more pronounced in paroxysmal AF than in persistent AF, performing an adequate PV isolation is still a key part in treating persistent AF. There are now numerous techniques to obtain long-lasting pulmonary vein isolation and avoid esophageal damage. Patients with persistent AF will frequently require a more aggressive mapping and ablative approach. Ablation of sites associated with non-PV triggers such as the entire posterior wall, the roof, the anterior part of the left atrial (LA) septum, the left atrial appendage (LAA), the coronary sinus, and the superior vena cava has been shown to improve the freedom from AF at follow-up when combined with PV isolation. We do not encourage the use of empiric lines or complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Several studies have shown the role of empirical LAA electrical isolation in persistent AF. Summary: When focal ectopic atrial activity is observed after PV isolation, its activation sequence is compared to that of sinus rhythm, allowing quick identification of its origin. For significant non-PV triggers (repetitive isolated beats, focal atrial tachycardias or beats triggering AF/atrial flutter), a more detailed activation mapping is performed in the area of origin. They are subsequently targeted with focal ablation, except for triggers originating from the superior vena cava (SVC), LAA, or coronary sinus, for which complete isolation of these structures is the ablation strategy of choice. We truly believe the LAA and the posterior LA wall deserve special consideration when managing patients with persistent AF.

AB - Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to determine the role of pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as to determine based on prospective randomized data which other approaches may increase the success rate of radiofrequency ablation of persistent AF. Recent Findings: Special attention must be paid to detect, diagnose, and optimize management of reversible or treatable causes of persistent AF such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and stress. Though the role of PVs is more pronounced in paroxysmal AF than in persistent AF, performing an adequate PV isolation is still a key part in treating persistent AF. There are now numerous techniques to obtain long-lasting pulmonary vein isolation and avoid esophageal damage. Patients with persistent AF will frequently require a more aggressive mapping and ablative approach. Ablation of sites associated with non-PV triggers such as the entire posterior wall, the roof, the anterior part of the left atrial (LA) septum, the left atrial appendage (LAA), the coronary sinus, and the superior vena cava has been shown to improve the freedom from AF at follow-up when combined with PV isolation. We do not encourage the use of empiric lines or complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Several studies have shown the role of empirical LAA electrical isolation in persistent AF. Summary: When focal ectopic atrial activity is observed after PV isolation, its activation sequence is compared to that of sinus rhythm, allowing quick identification of its origin. For significant non-PV triggers (repetitive isolated beats, focal atrial tachycardias or beats triggering AF/atrial flutter), a more detailed activation mapping is performed in the area of origin. They are subsequently targeted with focal ablation, except for triggers originating from the superior vena cava (SVC), LAA, or coronary sinus, for which complete isolation of these structures is the ablation strategy of choice. We truly believe the LAA and the posterior LA wall deserve special consideration when managing patients with persistent AF.

KW - Atrial fibrillation (AF)

KW - Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs)

KW - Left atrial appendage (LAA)s

KW - Pulmonary veins (PV)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018372942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018372942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12170-017-0544-7

DO - 10.1007/s12170-017-0544-7

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

JO - Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

JF - Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

SN - 1932-9520

IS - 6

M1 - 19

ER -