Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating

David M. Buss, David P. Schmitt

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article proposes a contextual-evolutionary theory of human mating strategies. Both men and women are hypothesized to have evolved distinct psychological mechanisms that underlie short-term and long-term strategies. Men and women confront different adaptive problems in short-term as opposed to long-term mating contexts. Consequently, different mate preferences become activated from their strategic repertoires. Nine key hypotheses and 22 predictions from Sexual Strategies Theory are outlined and tested empirically. Adaptive problems sensitive to context include sexual accessibility, fertility assessment, commitment seeking and avoidance, immediate and enduring resource procurement, paternity certainty, assessment of mate value, and parental investment. Discussion summarizes 6 additional sources of behavioral data, outlines adaptive problems common to both sexes, and suggests additional contexts likely to cause shifts in mating strategy.

    LanguageEnglish (US)
    Pages204-232
    Number of pages29
    JournalPsychological Review
    Volume100
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

    Fingerprint

    Paternity
    Information Storage and Retrieval
    Fertility
    Psychology
    Evolutionary
    Sexual
    Mate
    Psychological
    Repertoire
    Certainty
    Accessibility
    Avoidance
    Resources
    Evolutionary Theory
    Prediction
    Causes
    Procurement
    Contextual

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)

    Cite this

    Sexual Strategies Theory : An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. / Buss, David M.; Schmitt, David P.

    In: Psychological Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 204-232.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Buss, David M. ; Schmitt, David P./ Sexual Strategies Theory : An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. In: Psychological Review. 1993 ; Vol. 100, No. 2. pp. 204-232
    @article{a37d662f72ab43dfbf869a708acb37b2,
    title = "Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating",
    abstract = "This article proposes a contextual-evolutionary theory of human mating strategies. Both men and women are hypothesized to have evolved distinct psychological mechanisms that underlie short-term and long-term strategies. Men and women confront different adaptive problems in short-term as opposed to long-term mating contexts. Consequently, different mate preferences become activated from their strategic repertoires. Nine key hypotheses and 22 predictions from Sexual Strategies Theory are outlined and tested empirically. Adaptive problems sensitive to context include sexual accessibility, fertility assessment, commitment seeking and avoidance, immediate and enduring resource procurement, paternity certainty, assessment of mate value, and parental investment. Discussion summarizes 6 additional sources of behavioral data, outlines adaptive problems common to both sexes, and suggests additional contexts likely to cause shifts in mating strategy.",
    author = "Buss, {David M.} and Schmitt, {David P.}",
    year = "1993",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "100",
    pages = "204--232",
    journal = "Psychological Review",
    issn = "0033-295X",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sexual Strategies Theory

    T2 - Psychological Review

    AU - Buss,David M.

    AU - Schmitt,David P.

    PY - 1993/1/1

    Y1 - 1993/1/1

    N2 - This article proposes a contextual-evolutionary theory of human mating strategies. Both men and women are hypothesized to have evolved distinct psychological mechanisms that underlie short-term and long-term strategies. Men and women confront different adaptive problems in short-term as opposed to long-term mating contexts. Consequently, different mate preferences become activated from their strategic repertoires. Nine key hypotheses and 22 predictions from Sexual Strategies Theory are outlined and tested empirically. Adaptive problems sensitive to context include sexual accessibility, fertility assessment, commitment seeking and avoidance, immediate and enduring resource procurement, paternity certainty, assessment of mate value, and parental investment. Discussion summarizes 6 additional sources of behavioral data, outlines adaptive problems common to both sexes, and suggests additional contexts likely to cause shifts in mating strategy.

    AB - This article proposes a contextual-evolutionary theory of human mating strategies. Both men and women are hypothesized to have evolved distinct psychological mechanisms that underlie short-term and long-term strategies. Men and women confront different adaptive problems in short-term as opposed to long-term mating contexts. Consequently, different mate preferences become activated from their strategic repertoires. Nine key hypotheses and 22 predictions from Sexual Strategies Theory are outlined and tested empirically. Adaptive problems sensitive to context include sexual accessibility, fertility assessment, commitment seeking and avoidance, immediate and enduring resource procurement, paternity certainty, assessment of mate value, and parental investment. Discussion summarizes 6 additional sources of behavioral data, outlines adaptive problems common to both sexes, and suggests additional contexts likely to cause shifts in mating strategy.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027583764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027583764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

    DO - 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

    M3 - Article

    VL - 100

    SP - 204

    EP - 232

    JO - Psychological Review

    JF - Psychological Review

    SN - 0033-295X

    IS - 2

    ER -